A broken brand?

David Wagner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.e.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Sandro writes:
>MarkM clarified in a follow-up: types wouldn't have helped if you want 
>to retain transparent intermediation.

Ahh, my apologies for missing that.  Can you explain why we'd want
transparent intermediation?  Are we talking about the membrane pattern,
or something like that?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.