Re: Joe-E 2.0 Release
"Tyler Close" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:10 PM, David Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > Tyler Close writes: > >I've got an alternate proposal for marking Joe-E code. > > > >Java supports package annotations that are available at both compile > >time and runtime. I suggest Joe-E define an annotation > >org.joe_e.verified. To enable Joe-E verification of a package, the > >programmer adds the standard package-info.java file with content: > > > >@org.joe_e.verified package org.example.stuff; > > > >The Policy class can then check that a reflected member is either > >defined in a Joe-E verified package, or is enabled in the safej > >database. The safej database then doesn't need to contain any > >information about Joe-E verified code, only tamed Java code. > > Interesting. Thanks for the concrete proposal. This sounds worth > mulling over. It looks like the Joe-E library can be updated to use this proposal by simply adding the last 3 lines below to org.joe_e.reflect.Reflection#safe(): static private boolean safe(final Member member) { final Class declarer = member.getDeclaringClass(); if (declarer.getPackage().isAnnotationPresent(verified.class)) { return true; } ... --Tyler