Re: A broken brand?

On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 23:38 -0800, David Wagner wrote:
> I've been reading the Caja spec.  It includes an example of a brand
> implemented in Caja, using an implementation technique attributed to
> Marc Stiegler.  I think I may have found an attack on it, and I was
> curious whether this was well-known.  

[snip]

> It doesn't look too difficult to
> modify the brand to defend against the above attack (e.g., by resetting
> flag to false and squirrel to null before unseal() returns), although
> I haven't checked whether there are any other attacks.

Marc Stiegler's original implementation, to which I believe the
attribution in the Caja spec is referring, appears as part of his
"PictureBook of Secure Cooperation"
http://www.skyhunter.com/marcs/SecurityPictureBook.ppt

(BTW, someone really ought to wikify this thing on wiki.erights.org ...)

Examining the code, reveals that it would not suffer from this
vulnerability. The original code in E:

def makeSealerUnsealerPair() {
    var shared := def none {}
    def sealer  {
        to seal(obj) {
            return def box { to share() { shared := obj }}
        }
    }
    def unsealer {
        to unseal(box) {
            shared := none
            try { box.share(); require(shared != none)
                   return shared
            } finally { shared := none }
         }
    }
    return [sealer,unsealer]
}

Here, "shared" takes on the role of both "flag" and "squirrel". "shared
== none" here is equivalent to "!flag" in the Caja version. 

I believe that the "finally { shared := none }" ensures that this attack
would not succeed on this code.