Re: Naming convention for variable holding an eventual reference

David Wagner wrote:
>
> This variant doesn't provide a naming convention on the variables
> themselves, only a special syntax at the place where those variables
> are used -- just like your proposal.  The only advantage of this
> variant over your proposal is that this variant avoids the inversion.
>
I don't have any problem with the inversion.  Programmers are used to seeing code evaluated from the innermost nested parens out.

________________________
Alan Karp
Principal Scientist
Virus Safe Computing Initiative
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
1501 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
(650) 857-3967, fax (650) 857-7029
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Alan_Karp