Re: Naming convention for variable holding an eventual reference
Bill Frantz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <r02010500-1049-9A915172261211DD81710030658F0F64@[192.168.1.5]> |
[email protected] (Mark Miller) on Sunday, May 18, 2008 wrote: >On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Ka-Ping Yee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Baldur Johannsson wrote: >>> if there is no insistence on English I propose the variable name >>> suffix "_loks". Which is an translation of "eventual" to Icelandic. >> >> There is a one-character, one-syllable particle in Chinese that can >> be attached to any verb to indicate an ongoing/continuing/in-progress >> activity, but it might be a bit hard to type... :) > >Whoa, timely! Yup, this fails the ascii-only restriction. We can always use the Pinyin spelling, which is ASCII. I know of the Chinese particle "le" which means completed action. (For those who are keeping score, Chinese doesn't consider the ideas of past, present, future as fundamental as whether the action is completed. I can express the concepts of "will have finished next week", "have presently finished", and "already finished it last week" using the same sentence.) I don't know the particle Ka-Ping Yee references which indicates continuing activity(, and thought it was just the absence of "le".) Cheers - Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | When it comes to the world | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | around us, is there any choice | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | but to explore? - Lisa Randall | Los Gatos, CA 95032