Re: VatTP and Waterken protocols compared

"Marc Stiegler" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.e.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It has worked well enough for us only for the simplest upgrade scenarios.
The jury is still out on harder scenarios. The only thing for certain is, we
will need better tools for harder upgrades. The question is, can tools good
enough be made at all?

--marcs

2008/9/20 Karp, Alan H <[email protected]>

>  MarkM wrote:
>
>
> > The acid test of the two philosophies will be their friendliness to
> upgrade. On this, the jury is still out. (Research opportunity!)
>
>
> Tyler has written a "touch" program that reserializes after an upgrade. It
> has worked quite well for us.
>
>
>
> ________________________
>
> Alan Karp
>
> Principal Scientist
>
> Virus Safe Computing Initiative
>
> Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
>
> 1501 Page Mill Road
>
> Palo Alto, CA 94304
>
> (650) 857-3967, fax (650) 857-7029
>
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Alan_Karp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e-lang mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang
>
>

_______________________________________________
e-lang mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.