Unquoted backslashes for identifier escapes?
Kevin Reid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The ::"foo bar" syntax for noun strings is rather ugly and not well- justified. How about, replacing the current noun-string and verb-string, allowing backslash escapes in identifiers, which would work uniformly rather than being different for nouns and verbs? That is: Current New ::"foo bar" foo\ bar c."add(Component)"(d) c.add\(Component\)(d) Actually, I can think of one disadvantage already: the quote syntax permits the empty string, whereas backslashes need at least one character to escape. Not that it's *sensible* to use the empty string for an identifier, but the regularity is good. Common Lisp uses essentially this approach for symbol names -- the escaping is uniform -- but it has a "multiple escape" which is essentially quotes: add\(Component\) single escape |add(Component)| multiple escape || empty-string-named symbol using multiple escape What comes to mind to have such a syntax in E is: \"foo bar" \"add(Component)" \"" But that is rather peculiar and inconsistent with other uses of backslash. -- Kevin Reid <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>