Re: (fully qualified) names of basic types
David-Sarah Hopwood <david.hopwood-mRVxzIiVagSlV3Ge8JjJtnfLna9zW77MtUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kevin Reid wrote: > We recently had a discussion on IRC about what the FQNs of the basic > types such as integer, float, string, etc. should be on E > implementations that are not Java-based, since it would be > inappropriate to use java.lang.*. We decided to use > org.erights.e.elib.atom.*. > > Further question: What are the *names* of these two types: > > Int or Integer? > Char or Character? Does that represent a Unicode character, or a code unit? -- David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥ _______________________________________________ e-lang mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang