Re: Module naming and identification
Lex Spoon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill -- Cool! Mark.... whoa. I agree that's the same framework I am using, described back in 2000. Maybe I even read it; I can't remember! I have to ask: your first message mentions cycles specifically, but three messages later you still didn't address them. Do you have a pointer to that issue? It's highly relevant for modules. Finally, I would slightly quibble about the discussion of DLL hell. I agree that, e.g., choosing the module author's latest version of a module will inevitably lead to incompatible modules, rending of hair, and gnashing of teeth. However, such a choice is subtly different from choosing a *distribution's* latest version of a module, which IMHO looks pretty good. Lex _______________________________________________ e-lang mailing list [email protected] http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang