Re: (Caja-CapTP) Re: Mutual introduction & a species of whale
Tyler Close <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Kevin Reid<[email protected]> wrote: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 20:10, Tyler Close wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Kevin Reid<[email protected]> wrote: >>> I am currently not using Tyler's JS ref_send because its interface to >>> JavaScript appears to be incompatible with the sort CapTP wants (with >>> regard to object types and distinctions and so on). >> >> I'm surprised by that. Can you give me more details? > > The first thing I noticed (from the implementation of 'near') is that > any function is considered a promise. In a CapTP-style system, any > arbitrary unknown object should be treated as a Selfish object. I > could declare that 'functions are not objects', but that ...just > doesn't feel right, in this context. Anything else? I can put a marker on the promise functions if that's all you need. --Tyler -- "Waterken News: Capability security on the Web" http://waterken.sourceforge.net/recent.html