Re: On a capability-structured universe

John Carlson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.e.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It seems like ambient authority is similar to an objective universe  
(each subject basically sees similar stuff), and ocaps are similar to  
a subjective universe (each subject sees their capabilities).  Reality  
is a mixture between the two.


On Aug 19, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Kevin Reid wrote:

> I've occasionally pondered the idea of simulating a capability-
> structured universe; it would be essentially a capability operating
> system on a finite machine, but with a design such that the amount of
> computation occurring is constant ("conserved"); i.e. there are no
> errors such that programs stop and are not replaced by something else.
>
> It occurred to me that the latter portion of Greg Egan's _Schild's
> Ladder_ depicts something similar to how such a universe (containing
> complex structures) might end up, or at least, similarly different
> from the universe we have. Well, so far as I recall the details; it's
> been a year or two since I read it.
>
> -- 
> Kevin Reid                                  <http://switchb.org/kpreid/ 
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e-lang mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.