Re: Fwd: Chat with [email protected]

On Sep 19, 2009, at 12:04, Mark Miller wrote:

> There are four protocol transitions CapTP needs to make. Given the
> current minuscule adoption, I'm inclined to make all four changes
> simultaneously and not worry about compatibility.
>
> * Switching from our custom DataComm to a VatTP layered on top of TLS.
> Tyler and Kevin have both made progress towards this goal.

I have done nothing related to this, but I agree it is the goal.

> * Change the exposed object APIs (esp the Miranda Methods) to
> something more language neutral, as already adopted by Caja-CapTP, so
> that Caja-CapTP and E-CapTP can interoperate better.

I have done nothing related to this, and I do not know what could be  
'more language neutral' and still accomplish the goals  
straightforwardly, besides placing them as out-of-band CapTP messages.

The only thing Caja-CapTP does in particular is give the miranda  
messages[*] longer names (to reduce the chance of conflicts with  
existing JavaScript programs) and only incorporate the ones which are  
necessary to CapTP.



[*] I distinguish between the miranda protocol, those significant  
messages, and the miranda *methods*, the default implementation thereof.

-- 
Kevin Reid                                  <http://switchb.org/kpreid/>