Re: [Caja] Important new paper: The Need for Capability Policiies
"Rob Meijer" <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:07:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, July 11, 2013 17:29, Mark Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11 July 2013 14:51, Shriram Krishnamurthi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > inside every Web-based cap program is an ACL struggling to be heard. Hmm, I would actually say that inside every web-credential/acl there is a decompose tree of attenuable and authority waiting to be allowed to be conveniently delegated and revoked using capabilities. B.t.w, does this list honor any 'don't archive' mail headers? I think the slides to an upcoming talk of mine may be relevant to this discussion, I would like to share it with the list, but I don't want to make them available yet through Google (searching my name of that of my talk) for people not on the list that are going to be visiting the event. >> > (I even once saw erights write a program that had a hand-coded ACL in >> > it.) >> > > Indeed. Horton can be seen this way. > > > >> >> My position is that ultimately you have to resort to policy, and >> policy can be expressed in various ways - for example, "ask the user" >> is a popular one, but ACLs are certainly a viable alternative. I >> believe I said as much in http://www.links.org/files/capabilities.pdf. >> >> > The difference between ACLs and the kinds of policies in this paper is >> > that these look to me for the most part to be traditional program >> > *properties*. In contrast, policy languages are part of the active >> > execution of the program, usually as a callout to some policy >> > decision/enforcement agent. >> > > Do you have a positive example? > > > >> > >> > Shriram >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> "Google Caja Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an >> email to google-caja-discuss+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/[email protected] >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > > -- > Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain > > Cheers, > --MarkM > _______________________________________________ > e-lang mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang >