Re: Monte Language -- wow
William ML Leslie <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:41:24 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.e.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHgd1hGJKUyDHb=1GXJLxA=2xnDepxC-kSkQ0dbVvCc0cgdt5Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On 24 January 2016 at 13:56, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I just stumbled across the Monte language > http://monte.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html > > Wow. Have we discussed it here before? I don't remember that we have, but it > is hard to believe that we have not. Certainly not this MontE. That name has been kicked around as a hypothetical E/Python blend for at least the better part of a decade, but this /serious/ attempt at specifying and implementing it is brand new (github suggests 2014). > > Monte creators, > Are any of you on this list? Corbyn Simpson has been floating around in #erights since mid last year by my count, but isn't subscribed to any of these lists; he was working in graphics drivers when I first met him about four years ago iirc. Allen Short http://washort.twistedmatrix.com has surely been here before, a long-time E fan and Twisted developer, who was working on an E runtime in C [named Ecru] some time ago. They have been the primary developers of Monte. They both have very exacting standards. Definitely one to watch. If you're on freenode sometime, there's always activity in #monte ! -- William Leslie Notice: Likely much of this email is, by the nature of copyright, covered under copyright law. You absolutely MAY reproduce any part of it in accordance with the copyright law of the nation you are reading this in. Any attempt to DENY YOU THOSE RIGHTS would be illegal without prior contractual agreement.