Re: Memory allocation overhead
Eric Bezault <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.gobo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Colin Paul Adams wrote: > I would expect this to be a no-op. Is it not a call that provides > typing information only to the compiler, so that at run-time there is > not need for it? As I claimed many times in the past, no effort has been made yet to improve the performance of the generated C code. IN particular in term of inlining or dynamic binding. My priority is to be fully compliant with ECMA and ISE before tackling performance issues. And from what I can see, spending time on this issue now will not significantly improve your figures as long as most of the time is still spent in the GC. -- Eric Bezault mailto:[email protected] http://www.gobosoft.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone