Re: Memory allocation overhead

Eric Bezault <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.gobo.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Lothar Scholz wrote:
> EB> I just saw that in your last check-in you used MEMORY.free.
> EB> This is a bad idea in my opinion. And it won't help anyway
> EB> when using gec+boehm (it's currently implemented as a no-op).
> 
> Which GC version are you using? GC_free is implemented in "malloc.c"
> and it works fine. I used it starting with 6.7 upto the latest
> 7.1.beta3-snapshot it was never a no-op.

I didn't say that GC_free was a no-op. MEMORY.free is.

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.gobosoft.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.