Re: Errors caught by gelint in XM_XPATH classes

I will deal with this next weekend, as I only have a laptop this weekend.
Also Unicode 5.1 has been released a week ago, so I will prepare an
update for that too.

On 10/04/2008, Eric Bezault <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gelint reports the following errors:
>
>  [VUAR-2] class XM_XPATH_ARRAY_LIST_ITERATOR (33,25): the 1-th actual
>  argument (of type 'NONE') does not conform to the corresponding formal
>  argument (of type 'G') of feature `has' in class DS_ARRAYED_LIST.
>  ----
>  [VUAR-2] class XM_XPATH_ARRAY_LIST_ITERATOR (46,25): the 1-th actual
>  argument (of type 'NONE') does not conform to the corresponding formal
>  argument (of type 'G') of feature `has' in class DS_ARRAYED_LIST.
>  ----
>  [VUAR-2] class XM_XPATH_ARRAY_LIST_ITERATOR (205,21): the 1-th actual
>  argument (of type 'NONE') does not conform to the corresponding formal
>  argument (of type 'G') of feature `has' in class DS_ARRAYED_LIST.
>  ----
>  [VUAR-2] class XM_XPATH_REVERSE_ARRAY_LIST_ITERATOR (33,25): the 1-th
>  actual argument (of type 'NONE') does not conform to the corresponding
>  formal argument (of type 'G') of feature `has' in class DS_ARRAYED_LIST.
>  ----
>  [VUAR-2] class XM_XPATH_REVERSE_ARRAY_LIST_ITERATOR (46,25): the 1-th
>  actual argument (of type 'NONE') does not conform to the corresponding
>  formal argument (of type 'G') of feature `has' in class DS_ARRAYED_LIST.
>  ----
>  [VUAR-2] class XM_XPATH_REVERSE_ARRAY_LIST_ITERATOR (174,21): the 1-th
>  actual argument (of type 'NONE') does not conform to the corresponding
>  formal argument (of type 'G') of feature `has' in class DS_ARRAYED_LIST.
>  ----
>
>  One way to solve this problem is to use inline agents ;-)))
>  Anyway, the assertions are obviously wrong, it should be:
>
>    no_void_item: not a_list.has (Void)
>                  ^^^
>  Probably not caught earlier because of the bug in gexace.
>
>  OK, I can feel the fact that you don't want to use inline
>  agents. So, there are several other solutions.
>
>  1) Add a routine `has_default' in class DS_SEARCHABLE.
>
>  2) Add a routine `default_item: G' in your class and
>     call: not a_list.has (default_item). But this will
>     not be practical for assertions in creation routines.
>
>  3) Use KL_ANY_ROUTINES.same_objects:
>      not a_list.there_exists (agent ANY_.same_objects (?, Void))
>
>  Solution 3 is the one which will work without any additional
>  code.
>
>  PS: I would tend to avoid declaring the generic parameter
>  as 'reference G' because it is not part of ECMA Eiffel is
>  I remember correctly.
>
>  --
>  Eric Bezault
>  mailto:[email protected]
>  http://www.gobosoft.com
>
>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>  Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
>  Use priority code J8TL2D2.
>  http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
>  _______________________________________________
>  gobo-eiffel-develop mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gobo-eiffel-develop
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone