Re: Binary search tree

On 24/04/2008, Daniel Tuser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Colin Adams wrote:

>  I know that the indexing clause does not conform to the Gobo styling
> standards so far. And the class name should be in the same line as the class
> keyword. Those are the two non-conforming things I know. Did you find more?

There area a load of empty feature clauses and a dummy invariant in at
least one
class.

Then I dislike the absence of a blank line after create and inherit.

Also I dislike seeing local variables with names that might class with
attributes (and so forcing unnecessary renames in descendants).
I personally now write all argument names as a_*, and all local names
as either a single chanaracter or l_*. I am converting my existing
code on a piecemeal basis.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone