Re: Conformance of literals to attached arguments

Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I just came across this:
> 
> Error code: VUAR(2)
> Type error: non-conforming actual argument in feature call. 
> What to do: make sure that type of actual argument conforms to type
>   of corresponding formal argument. 
> 
> Class: ST_TEST_ST_STRING

I would have called the test just ST_TEST_STRING. It's the "STRING"
class from the library "ST".

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.gobosoft.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/