Re: Question about catcalls

Daniel Tuser wrote:
> Daniel Tuser wrote:
>> Eric Bezault wrote:
>>> Daniel Tuser wrote:
>>>> In my opinion the code in catcall_problem.e contains no catcall. The 
>>>> following lines show the output of gec. I understand the problem of 
>>>> gec, but it will never happen. Is that a catcall according to the 
>>>> ECMA specification?
>>>
>>> The ECMA specification does not say much about CAT-calls.
>>> In gec, there can be false alarms like these, but the
>>> advantage is that when there is no error reported we know
>>> for sure that there will be no CAT-calls at runtime. It
>>> is usually possible to rewrite the code to avoid such
>>> CAT-calls messages. At least it was possible to do so
>>> for the code currently in the Gobo package.
>>>
>> My goal was to write test cases for DS_BILINEAR_TABLE and 
>> DS_BILINEAR_SET. All the binary search tree variants could have used 
>> them and maybe DS_HASH_[TABLE|SET] as well. But I had to stop because 
>> of those CAT-calls. Should I write separate test cases for all the 
>> variants or do you think it would be manageable to improve the 
>> CAT-call detection?
>>
> I had a look at the classes that are involved in detecting the 
> CAT-calls. From my point of view it is not worth the effort (at least 
> for me), so I will write separate test cases.

OK.

I tried to find ways to rewrite the code to avoid the CAT-call
error messages, but could not find one yet (apart from duplicating
the code for each container).

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.gobosoft.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/