Re: [review] UC_STRING.area_lower, and area_upper should be exported to {READABLE_STRING_8, READABLE_STRING_32}

Should Jocelyn send those specific issues using the sourceforge bug tracker?

Manu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Bezault [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:13 AM
> To: Jocelyn
> Cc: gobodev
> Subject: Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] [review] UC_STRING.area_lower, and
> area_upper should be exported to {READABLE_STRING_8, READABLE_STRING_32}
> 
> Jocelyn wrote:
> > Compiling Gobo's with ISE's "full class checking" option enabled, you
> > can notice that
> >
> > In class UC_STRING, the feature  `area_lower', `area_upper' should be
> > exported to {READABLE_STRING_8, READABLE_STRING_32}
> 
> According to gelint, the problem was only on `area_lower'.
> The problem is that this routine does not exist in ISE 6.3
> and READABLE_STRING_8 does not exist in ISE 6.2.
> 
> I'll try to find another solution.
> 
> > ps: Maybe, there are other similar cases in UC_STRING, and this class
> > might benefit a deep review to match recent changes of the STRING_*
> > interface.
> 
> Yes, but it is a huge task, because the XML library will have to be
> updated accordingly.
> 
> --
> Eric Bezault
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://www.gobosoft.com
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> gobo-eiffel-develop mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gobo-eiffel-develop


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword