Re: [review] comment and expected deferred status of KI_BUFFER.item

Emmanuel Stapf [ES] wrote:
>> I already spent 2 hours yesterday to try to reproduce it on a small
>> example to no avail.
> 
> Can you ask whoever had the problem to contact me and I'll try to shadow him?

Too late: we rolled back the modification as soon as we noticed
the problem.

In the meantime, even though I didn't manage to reproduce the problem
I know why: it depends on whether two C header files happened to be
grouped in the same Big C file or not. But even when they are not,
the problem is there, even though the C compiler does not complain.

I'll submit a detailed bug report next week when I'll be back from
vacation.

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.gobosoft.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword