[Fwd: RE: gexace]
Eric Bezault <ericb-D6Qt/9opevxWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gobo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Second try. -- Eric Bezault mailto:ericb-D6Qt/9opevxWk0Htik3J/[email protected] http://www.gobosoft.com -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: gexace Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:56:58 -0500 From: "Bolstad, Mark (Cont,ARL/CISD)" <[email protected]> To: "Eric Bezault" <ericb-D6Qt/9opevxWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Bolstad, Mark (Cont,ARL/CISD) wrote: > I'd like it to work with both. It currently works only with ISE in > the form listed below. Moving the "." out of the statement will > generate bogus compile statements. ISE sticks a "-I" at the beginning > of an include line in the ACE file, hence the ".". And what do you get with SmartEiffel when using the "." trick? (I'm under Windows so I cannot really try.) -I. -I`pkg-config --cflags -Ipango` Right now, I just postprocess the SmartEiffel generated <executable>.make to force it into the proper form. I could hardcode the paths in the xace file, but since I install things in non-standard locations, it certainly wouldn't be portable I'm working on a SmartEiffel patch that should fix this, but it would be a Unix only kind of thing, so I'm not sure if the SmartEiffel people will accept it. Mark To Post a message, send it to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [email protected] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gobo-eiffel/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/