Re: ECMA standard or forking the language?

Colnet Dominique <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.smalleiffel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> Concerning the "fork" issue, my perspective from my recent close reading
> of the ECMA draft is that it is not the SmartEiffel team who are forking.
> ECMA is the fork.
Perfectly right.
As I have said many times during ECMA meetings, this (speaking about
the ECMA meeting in progress) is not a normalization work.
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
[email protected] -- IUT (Nancy 2) -- INRIA Lorraine
http://SmartEiffel.loria.fr  --  The GNU Eiffel Compiler
POST: Loria, B.P. 239,54506 Vandoeuvre les Nancy Cedex, FRANCE
Voice:+33 0383913140 Mobile: +33 0665362381 Fax:+33 0383581701
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.