Re: Oh my! Re: ECMA standard or forking the language?
Berend de Boer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.smalleiffel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paolo Redaelli <[email protected]> writes: > So I'm suggesting the Smarteiffel team that continuing supporting Gobo > is quite a smart move. Once you support Gobo you get almost all the > "active" Eiffel community on your side, ETL3 or not. As Gobo works with SE 1.x, ISE 5.x, VE 4.x and VE 5.x, I think this is a very clear example who is forking and making incompatible changes to the Eiffel language. But I'm glad that we have a clear statement from the SE team now. - -- Live long and prosper, Berend de Boer (PGP public key: http://www.pobox.com/~berend/berend-public-key.txt) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCc1QdIyuuaiRyjTYRAntVAJ9ta8VXrO0NlEO5Qicv9VwgES/CkwCdEpey KXTlATRpMxTWwK21vST8zW4= =QUbg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----