Re: Oh my! Re: ECMA standard or forking the language?
Berend de Boer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.smalleiffel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dominique Colnet <[email protected]> writes: >> As Gobo works with SE 1.x, ISE 5.x, VE 4.x and VE 5.x, I think this is >> a very clear example who is forking and making incompatible changes to >> the Eiffel language. > Yes. It is clear that the main author of gobo is paid by the main > customer of ISE. Keep that in mind too. A strange statement. I'm pretty sure most of the commits done in the last two years weren't done by Eric. And as I said: Gobo used to work on SE too. It still works for every other Eiffel compiler and versions up to years back. And they are not ECMA Eiffel, because no one in the Gobo team uses those features, because we still support SE 1.0. It is the SE team that has departed. - -- Regards, Berend de Boer (PGP public key: http://www.pobox.com/~berend/berend-public-key.txt) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCdpsKIyuuaiRyjTYRAoJ+AKCjDr79mAAOPK21ZISzk3BO0hgwWQCg2C5R QguVIaY1I+vzvcTSpFt3gH8= =qZSm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----