Re: SmartEiffel shortcomings?

Hello,

Roger Browne <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder where SmartEiffel would be now if the team had adopted a more
> open attitude towards outside contributions?

I wonder where we would be now if people REALLY contributed code instead 
of already saying thay cannot because their code wasn't accepted once, or 
even twice!

I mean, go on other projects lists, for example the linux kernel. How many 
rebutals do you get before having a *single* line accepted? And the 
rebutals may be quite harsh, we look like white lambs beside of them (e.g. 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.lsm/1063)

So stop whining, roll up your sleeves and CODE! *YOU* are responsible if 
your code is accepted or not. Not us.

Regards
-- 
Cyril ADRIAN -- ALPLOG 
@ PSA Peugeot Citroën, Sochaux, France 
tél. +33 (0)3 81 33 48 76 
fax +33 (0)3 81 33 16 06 
Vt Sol inter planetas, 
Ita MVSICA inter Artes Liberales 
in medio radiat 
-- Heinrich Schütz, 1640