Re: SmartEiffel shortcomings?
Wolfgang Jansen <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:25:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.eiffel.smalleiffel |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Potsdam, Institute of Informatics |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not everything? Nothing is implemented since nothing works. Philippe Ribet wrote: > Wolfgang Jansen wrote: > >> [email protected] wrote: >> >>>> Have you ever compiled the examples in the tutorial/storable >>>> directory? I did not expect that users must write bug reports to show >>>> that tutorial examples do not compile. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I *do* expect that people who use beta release understand that some >>> things may not be working. That's what betas are for. >>> >>> >>> >> And I do expect that developers made at least minimal tests >> before releasing something, beta or not. >> All the more if a new feature has been offered (as is the case with >> persistence in SE 2.2+beta): it must be possible to demonstrate >> the new feature's functionality. >> >>>> Is it not your duty to check that at least the tutorials are working? >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course. They will, when 2.2 is out. >>> >>> >> Maybe, we have different cultural background. >> Maybe mine requests me to be responsible for all of my work, >> even it is not yet finished. >> >> > Wolfgang, I don't think it's cultural background problem here. For me, > it's just another point of view. Please let me explain how the team > worked on this subject. The very first step was to write the examples > in the tutorial, before anything about storable is done. The purpose > was to get an user point of view. Those examples helped to determine > wishables properties. Then the storable class interface was about > defined and implementation could start. > > All the examples in the tutorial are not only to demonstrate how to > use the storable tool, but are designed to see if everybody agrees on > the proposed principles. You can give your opinion on those examples > if you want. > > Now, because of this approach, tutorial examples are here, even if not > everything is implemented. > Not everything? Nothing is implemented since nothing works. > Best regards, > Hmm. It's a rather ugly point of view. My point of view is that tutorials help users to learn using a new tool, e.g. by reproducing and then varying tutorial examples. (OK, it's a user's point of view and not so important.) WJ