Re: Re: SmartEiffel shortcomings?

> (OK, it's a user's point of view and not so important.)

Wolfgang, please keep cool.

Philippe tried to explain our point of view. You may disagree but please 
don't be so sarcastic, your mails start to look like one L.S.'s and I 
would have no choice but stop reading them too... (big, big grin!)

Don't worry: tutorial examples will work eventually. Should we put a big 
warning in each not-yet-implemented class? I'd rather put a big warning in 
each beta release: "not for the faint of the heart" ;-)

STORABLE is a big thing. You know that. That's why we wanted to test the 
interface before developping it. So, our question is and remains, do you 
have any comments about our interface? Of course the classes don't 
compile, but do you feel at ease with how the source looks and feels?

Note that you now have all the tools to help us.

BTW, good news, [email protected] is on its way. I hope to announce 
that list in a few days.

Best regards,
-- 
Cyril ADRIAN -- ALPLOG 
@ PSA Peugeot Citroën, Sochaux, France 
tél. +33 (0)3 81 33 48 76 
fax +33 (0)3 81 33 16 06 
Vt Sol inter planetas, 
Ita MVSICA inter Artes Liberales 
in medio radiat 
-- Heinrich Schütz, 1640