Re: error in documentation of erl +swct flag
Rickard Green <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA_Z33P+qbXX2+s5CAk1rRnbbHN27qdTfdYLKLNFunNtzHiZVg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Richard Carlsson <[email protected]> wrote: > The erl documentation (http://www.erlang.org/doc/man/erl.html) currently > says: > +sws very_eager|eager|medium|lazy|very_lazy > > Set scheduler wake cleanup threshold. Default is medium. This flag controls > how eager schedulers should be requesting wake up due to certain cleanup > operations. When a lazy setting is used, more outstanding cleanup operations > can be left undone while a scheduler is idling. When an eager setting is > used, schedulers will more frequently be woken, potentially increasing > CPU-utilization. > > NOTE: This flag may be removed or changed at any time without prior notice. > > +sws default|legacy > > Set scheduler wakeup strategy. Default strategy changed in > erts-5.10/OTP-R16A. This strategy was previously known as proposal in > OTP-R15. The legacy strategy was used as default from R13 up to and > including R15. > > NOTE: This flag may be removed or changed at any time without prior notice. > > > I think that the first of these should be +swct (which was first mentioned > in the R16B01 release notes). > > /Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > erlang-bugs mailing list > [email protected] > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs > Thanks for the bug report. I just happened to notice this last week too, so there is already a fix for it in the maint and master branches <https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/5e72adfd8b56f50416d66a018028e2e6895032e0>. Regards, Rickard -- Rickard Green, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB _______________________________________________ erlang-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs