Re: ipv6 bug in inet:ntoa
Rik Ribbers <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:10:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFjSvn8-+qgwynzufADEQyhMuKM+G+DOkJ+TcnFUJSy=Mihaow@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello Raimo, You're welcome. As I'm relatively new to Erlang, is there an external source where I can monitor this issue? Or provide a fix: string:to_lower(erlang:integer_to_list(X,16)) Kind regards, Rik Op do 9 jul. 2015 om 11:44 schreef Raimo Niskanen < [email protected]>: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Rik Ribbers wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been playing around with ipv6 in erlang and came across at first > > strange behaviour in converting string to ipv6 and back > > > > ~ --> erl > > Erlang/OTP 18 [erts-7.0] [source-4d83b58] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] > > [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false] > > > > Eshell V7.0 (abort with ^G) > > 1>inet:parse_address("2a00:d78::147:94:198:152:68"). > > {ok,{10752,3448,0,327,148,408,338,104}} > > 2> inet:ntoa({10752,3448,0,327,148,408,338,104}). > > "2A00:D78:0:147:94:198:152:68" > > > > If you look closely you will see that there is an extra 0 introduced. > This > > is actually correct. In IETF RFC5952 section 4.2.2 states that a single 0 > > must not be shortened. This however introduces however the question is > the > > inet:parse_address is actually correct, however it is being friendly to > its > > caller... > > There is no ambiguity here so why not. > > > > > The real issue is however that the addresses are displayed in uppercase > > which is simply wrong. As RFC5952 clearly states in section 4.3. There is > > even Errata on this issue that states it must be in lower case. > > > > The RFC can be found here https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952 > > Oh dear. We'll probably have to fix that. > > To my defence I will say that the code is from November 2009 which predates > that RFC and that it tries to follow RFC 4291 or maybe RFC 3513. It also > uses > erlang:integer_to_list/2 that produces uppercase, just for the same reasons > that the rejected Errata voices... > > Thank you for pointing this out. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > Rik Ribbers > > > _______________________________________________ > > erlang-bugs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs > > > -- > > / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB > _______________________________________________ erlang-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs