Re: JSON in OTP

Kenneth Lundin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <CAOzgw92q2H=3MbSzonvk1gTqmVe1vEffKS6Pd6aXuACYSUPh2A@mail.gmail.com>
The answer is that looking back maybe we should have added JSON
encode/decode to OTP 12 years ago, but now there are a number of good
separate JSON libraries
outside OTP so why should we (the OTP team) take on the task of developing
and maintaining a JSON library.
Why is it better to include the JSON lib in OTP than to have it separate?
We have:
jsx, jsone, jiffy, .... to name a few

We or someone else could create an OTP+ distribution which includes OTP +
other popular non OTP applications. I even think Erlang Solutions has done
that at some point.

/Kenneth, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson

On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:39 PM Viktor Söderqvist <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 12 years have passed since EEP 18. [1] Since then, maps have been added
> to Erlang and the string module has been made accept binaries. This
> makes up a more obvious representation of JSON than in 2005 [2].
>
> If anyone was arguing that OTP is made for telecom and not web
> development, this argument doesn't hold anymore, now that the telecom
> standards are replacing GTP and Diameter with HTTP and JSON.
>
> The 5G mobile network specifications are full of JSON, REST and HTTP/2
> (e.g. 3GPP TS 29.500 [3]) and in 3GPP TS 29.501 [4] things like
> HATEOAS, OpenAPI specifications using JSON Schema and YAML files and
> how JSON documents should be patched using HTTP PATCH requests are
> covered. (Other interesting 5G specs are 23.501 [5] and 23.502 [6].)
>
> JSON has also been standardized as ECMA-404 [7] in 2017.
>
> Is it time to re-evaluate adding json:{encode,decode}/1 in OTP? Or are
> the arguments against it still valid?
>
> Regards,
> Viktor
>
> [1]: http://erlang.org/eeps/eep-0018.html
> [2]:
> http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2005-November/017805.html
> [3]: https://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/29500.htm (Click the Versions tab,
> then click a linked version number to download a zip file which
> contains a Word document, which can be converted to a readable
> format...)
> [4]: https://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/29501.htm
> [5]: https://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/23501.htm
> [6]: https://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/23502.htm
> [7]:
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-404.pdf
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.