Re: Implications of setting SIGCHLD in relation to NIFs

José Valim <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <CAGnRm4+Bde8PAXrZUAiJt1aZ40Lv0wUB6WKYKwO48Z97wDuo2Q@mail.gmail.com> 
I see, thanks Lukas!

Two follow up questions (please consider that I am not well versed in C):

1. Is there another option we could use instead of waitpid, in case we try
to patch upstream?

2. Instead of ignoring, could Erlang install a handler that removes the
zombie processes once invoked?




-- 


*José Valimhttps://dashbit.co/ <https://dashbit.co/>*
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.