Re: New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Raimo Niskanen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:28:35AM +0900, zxq9 wrote: > On 2021/01/22 1:43, Tristan Sloughter wrote: > > I've tried to just say my piece and leave it at that (summary: not a fan > > but would be nice to have a way to match in fun heads/list > > comprehensions where variables are shadowed) but have to say that after > > seeing these examples I'm starting to lean towards agreeing with Richard. > > I'm the opposite, but it probably doesn't matter. Why should it not matter? What might matter would be stating good arguments for one's reasoning. > Someone has an immaculate plan. Instead of such statements. > > Immaculate. > > -Craig You are attempting the Trump argumentation line: Repeat a lie until it is accepted as true. I hate that. Please stop doing that! -- / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB