Re: New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Raimo Niskanen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:28:35AM +0900, zxq9 wrote: > On 2021/01/22 1:43, Tristan Sloughter wrote: > > I've tried to just say my piece and leave it at that (summary: not a fan > > but would be nice to have a way to match in fun heads/list > > comprehensions where variables are shadowed) but have to say that after > > seeing these examples I'm starting to lean towards agreeing with Richard. > > I'm the opposite, but it probably doesn't matter. > Someone has an immaculate plan. > > Immaculate. I am trying again, in hopefully a more civilized manner... By constantly repeating that your opinion would not matter and that someone has a plan to force this feature through you indirectly say: *) That the decision process for an EEP and the Technical Board at Erlang/OTP at Ericsson can not be trusted to make a good decision for the Erlang language and the community. *) That the community does not want this feature. This is attacking the decision process itself instead of contributing to the decision. To me this feels like a way to force your point of view through in this decision. > > -Craig Best regards -- / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB