Re: New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns

Valentin Micic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
My apology if this sounds patronising to some.

At this point it is very difficult to follow this debate.

Why don’t we all park this discussion for a bit?
Let’s all cool down, and re-engage in a week.

Kind regards

V/


> On 22 Jan 2021, at 15:14, Richard Carlsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Den fre 22 jan. 2021 kl 13:23 skrev zxq9 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> I absolutely believe that Raimo and Richard are acting in good faith.
> They both care about Erlang and have put a lot into it over the years.
> 
> I disagree with this change on principle and in the face of what I view 
> as a more consistent alternative direction. I also disagree with how 
> this discussion is being framed.
> 
> The framing, assumptions, and what appears to be somewhat opaque 
> procedure is the rub, not the idea that someone came up with a proposal 
> for how to patch over one of the few warts in the language.
> 
> Thank you, Craig. 
> 
>         /Richard
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.