Re: New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Valentin Micic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My apology if this sounds patronising to some. At this point it is very difficult to follow this debate. Why don’t we all park this discussion for a bit? Let’s all cool down, and re-engage in a week. Kind regards V/ > On 22 Jan 2021, at 15:14, Richard Carlsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Den fre 22 jan. 2021 kl 13:23 skrev zxq9 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: > I absolutely believe that Raimo and Richard are acting in good faith. > They both care about Erlang and have put a lot into it over the years. > > I disagree with this change on principle and in the face of what I view > as a more consistent alternative direction. I also disagree with how > this discussion is being framed. > > The framing, assumptions, and what appears to be somewhat opaque > procedure is the rub, not the idea that someone came up with a proposal > for how to patch over one of the few warts in the language. > > Thank you, Craig. > > /Richard