Re: New EEP draft: Pinning operator ^ in patterns
Nalin Ranjan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACE+zkJ9TeHPST9h+PCFqjn=F-CPs5ehaNOcCS2KpVHtK3Am9A@mail.gmail.com> |
This one is interesting. नमस्ते। नलिन रंजन On Fri, Jan 22, 2021, 8:16 PM Richard Carlsson <[email protected]> wrote: > Den fre 22 jan. 2021 kl 15:33 skrev Richard Carlsson < > [email protected]>: > >> The other thing would be that you could no longer move around a fun or >> list comprehension to a different location and expect it to keep working as >> before - and I think that particularly for funs, this is a fundamental >> assumption with most people, even if they don't use shadowing today. >> > > I should add that for some people generating Erlang code automatically, > this would be a total blocker, because they often rely on this assumption > that each fun creates a new local scope in itself for the variables in the > head, and thus you can insert it anywhere. Also several macros out there > rely on this. > > /Richard > >