Re: PRO (was: PEEP: Annotate difference [...])
"Michael P." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20210129181550.41d4e419@aesop> |
:-) On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:25:40 +0100 Raimo Niskanen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 04:23:13PM +0100, Michael P. wrote: > > > > The annotation would reduce the need to "count" variables, > > reducing the effort to maintain the sequence. > > Sorry, I do not see that. > That sounds like rebinding, which this operator is not about I don't either. :-)) This is one thing I am going to dig up examples for, this will all be easier to understand via induction (instead of deducting examples from general claims). I have explained somewhere, every claim is electromagically its own counter-claim. I simply picked a claim that happened to present itself, put it here to make my idea clearer to others (and myself :-). ~M -- ¡Menos economia! - ¡Mas econotuya! Less economy! - More econoyou!