Re: PRO (was: PEEP: Annotate difference [...])

"Michael P." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <20210129181550.41d4e419@aesop>
:-)

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:25:40 +0100
Raimo Niskanen <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 04:23:13PM +0100, Michael P. wrote:
> >
> > The annotation would reduce the need to "count" variables,
> > reducing the effort to maintain the sequence.
>
> Sorry, I do not see that.
> That sounds like rebinding, which this operator is not about

I don't either. :-))

This is one thing I am going to dig up examples for,
this will all be easier to understand via induction
(instead of deducting examples from general claims).

I have explained somewhere, every claim is electromagically
its own counter-claim.

I simply picked a claim that happened to present itself,
put it here to make my idea clearer to others (and myself :-).

~M

--

¡Menos economia! - ¡Mas econotuya!

Less economy! - More econoyou!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.