Re: Specifying callbacks for behaviours extending gen_server

What if you only specify your own callbacks and let your implementors use...

-behavior(your behavior).
-behavior(gen_server).

?

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 16:15 Brett Hemes <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am designing a behaviour that extends gen_server and thus I want all of
> gen_server’s callback specification in addition to some additional ones on
> top as part of the extension.  In the past I have favored using the
> `-callback` attribute as recommended in the documentation but then I saw
> someone recommend the following when extending gen_server
>
>
>
> > behaviour_info(Type) -> gen_server:behaviour_info(Type).
>
>
>
> I tried combining the two approaches but such is not allowed (which makes
> sense).  I believe my options are to append my callbacks to gen_server’s
> list using `behaviour_info` or to copy gen_server’s callback specifications
> from the OTP source.  Copy-pasting code just feels wrong...  how bad is it
> to use `behaviour_info` over `-callback`?  And am I taking the right
> approach?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brett
>
-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile by Brujo Benavides