Re: Performance of mnesia:select/2

Jacob <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/26/21 3:53 PM, Dan Gudmundsson wrote:
> Interesting, and times do you get for 500 ets lookup on that data?

Oh, I really should have tested that as well:

timer:tc(fun () -> lists:map(fun(K) -> ets:lookup(t, K) end, Keys) end).

* using lookups: [set, {keypos, 2}]:               3148 us
* using lookup: [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]:  3423 us

I have repeated the select/pattern runs to have comparable results:

* using pattern, [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 3173 us
* using pattern, [set, {keypos, 2}]:               8091 us

Note that there was quite a high jitter on the measurements so I have
compute the mean value of 3 measurements each.

So lookups and pattern/ordered_set were too close to really come to a
winner here. I had the impression that the variance was slightly higher
with lookup, but digging into this would require a better measurement
setup than what I have been using.


>  
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 3:12 PM Jacob <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     assuming that the match spec compiler does clever things with
>     patterns,
>     I'd use select with the following
>
>        MatchExpression = [ {{'_', K, '_'}, [], ['$_']} || K <- Keys ]
>
>     If did some quick measurements with plain ETS, timer:tc and 500
>     keys out
>     of 1000000 table entries and got:
>
>        * using pattern, [ordered_set]: 4532605 us
>        * using pattern, [set]              :  4645525 us
>        * using pattern, [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 3826 us (!!!)
>        * using pattern, [set, {keypos, 2}]: 5714 us (!!!)
>
>        * using guards, [ordered_set]: 12542928 us
>        * using guards, [set]:               12310452 us
>        * using guards, [ordered_set, {keypos, 2}]: 12365477 us
>        * using guards, [set, {keypos, 2}]: 12277839 us
>
>     I have initialised the DB with [ ets:insert(t, {N, N,
>     integer_to_list(N)}) || N <- lists:seq(1, 1000000) ].
>
>     I don't know though, how this will translate to Mnesia, but I'd give
>     select with pattern on the primary key a try.
>
>     /Jacob
>
>
>     On 2/26/21 11:03 AM, Vance Shipley wrote:
>     > If I need to lookup a list of keys which is the better approach?
>     Why?
>     >
>     > Fselect = fun(Keys) ->
>     >         MatchHead = {'_', '$1', '$2'},
>     >         F = fun(Key) ->
>     >                 {'=:=', '$1', Key}
>     >         end,
>     >         MatchConditions = [list_to_tuple(['or' | lists:map(F,
>     Keys)]),
>     >         MatchBody = ['$_'],
>     >         MatchFunction = {MatchHead, MatchConditions, MatchBody},
>     >         MatchExpression = [MatchFunction],
>     >         mnesia:select(Table, MatchExpression)
>     > end,
>     > mnesia:transaction(Fselect, [Keys]).
>     >
>     > Fread = fun F([Key | T], Acc) ->
>     >                 [R] = mnesia:read(Table, Key),
>     >                 F(T, [R | Acc]);
>     >         F([], Acc) ->
>     >                 lists:reverse(Acc)
>     > end,
>     > mnesia:transaction(Fread, [Keys. []]).
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     >      -Vance
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.