Re: JIT status: how to introspect
Max Lapshin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMxVRxAjXmOJH2Txb09jwGfBC_vB1rBhCZ3zDhaAL8YaRa_aEw@mail.gmail.com> |
I've read this article: https://www.erlang-solutions.com/blog/performance-testing-the-jit-compiler-for-the-beam-vm/ and I see that perf top shows functions that are looking like $gen_server2_loop When I launch my flussonic with erl 24, I do not see any functions with this pattern, only functions from C. So this is why I want to understand: is JIT working or I haven't launched it at all? On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 10:43 PM Max Lapshin <[email protected]> wrote: > > 23.77% beam.smp [.] ac_find_all_non_overlapping > 13.11% libc-2.27.so [.] __memmove_avx_unaligned_erms > > I think that it is rather clear that we need to do something with > binary:split(..., [global]) > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:57 PM Dan Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > All code is jit-compiled, so there is nothing to check. > > > > The jit helps sequentiell code only, if that is not your bottleneck you will not see any speedup. > > as if your current code uses a lot of bif's/nif's and message passing. > > And I guess there is still minor stuff that can be improved. > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 6:01 PM Max Lapshin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi. > >> > >> I've tried to launch our flussonic under jit. > >> > >> Thank you a lot for this work. We got zero speedup, but perf top have > >> showed where we can achieve up to 20% of boost (or maybe more). > >> > >> > >> Is it possible to introspect current jit status? Something like: > >> > >> > >> > jit:info(). > >> #{ > >> calls => ... > >> misses => ... > >> ... > >> } > >> > >> or what do you use to check it in runtime?