Re: Support for non-unique process labels?

Stanislav Ledenev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <CAOkK=ALYGAc6_8H69P6tNT-bbKrAMBUVrRRkJt+hiv933vp5fw@mail.gmail.com>
>
> I don't think the choices that the OTP team has made are wrong. I have
> been working with Erlang since R13 and there is no doubt in my mind that
> OTP-24 is immensely better than R13 used to be (R13: Unicode? What's
> that?). That doesn't mean everything has been fixed of course. But a lot
> of work has already been done to improve Erlang/OTP in the direction you
> wish for it to go.

Furthermore I can clearly say that OTP-24 is much better than OTP-18.
And I really appreciate all members of the OTP team for such a great work
and well balanced decisions they make which helps Erlang remain Erlang.

пн, 10 мая 2021 г. в 12:52, Loïc Hoguin <[email protected]>:

> On 10/05/2021 11:37, Nicolas Martyanoff wrote:
> > At the end of the day, the answers here remind me of the Common Lisp
> > community. "Everything is fine, if you do not like it the problem is
> > you". After some time, people who get fed up leave, and the language
> > slowly dies.
>
> Every time someone complains about what Erlang/OTP is missing, and the
> community explains why things are the way they are, the person
> complaining ends up saying this.
>
> You cannot move forward without understanding where you are. We are not
> saying everything is fine, we are attempting to provide insight into why
> things are the way they are.
>
> The only languages that are able to cater to just about every use case
> are the ones that have either tons of users or have a strong corporate
> backing, or both. Other languages have to make choices and prioritize
> some things over others.
>
> I don't think the choices that the OTP team has made are wrong. I have
> been working with Erlang since R13 and there is no doubt in my mind that
> OTP-24 is immensely better than R13 used to be (R13: Unicode? What's
> that?). That doesn't mean everything has been fixed of course. But a lot
> of work has already been done to improve Erlang/OTP in the direction you
> wish for it to go.
>
> The fact that we largely went from "write a NIF to C libs" to "write an
> Erlang lib to implement the missing bits" is a strong testament to that.
> All that remains is making sure those missing bits make it into the
> standard library, rather than external libs.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> https://ninenines.eu
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.