RE: Re: Re: I am close to using a behaviour as a pure interface and I feel dirty...
Brett Hemes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CH2PR03MB53361B2233DFD5EF411DBF53BEC59@CH2PR03MB5336.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> |
Brujo! Yes I read both of these (and your other stuff too) some time back and they have been (and still are) very helpful on my journey. I just watched the presentation earlier today coincidentally in my search and it confirmed most of what I have learned but still doesn’t tackle my deeper questions like (“am I doing something stupid to even arrive at this line of questioning?” and “why shouldn’t I have a delegate behaviour and/or one of just callbacks?”, etc.). Thanks! Brett From: Fernando Benavides <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 4:54 PM To: Brett Hemes <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: I am close to using a behaviour as a pure interface and I feel dirty... I'm not entirely sure if this will help but a while back I wrote two articles and gave a talk about this subject. But I might have faced it from a different angle. These are the links: - https://youtu.be/OWCYD1Q0COQ - https://medium.com/erlang-battleground/erlang-behaviors-4348e89351ff - https://medium.com/erlang-battleground/erlang-behaviors-d5bb30d5412b On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 23:47 Brett Hemes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Erlang's behaviour is NOT an interface! > If you are looking for some analogy from other languages the closest one is abstract classes in C#. This isn’t very helpful... it is the exact same response I find in the forums with no reasoning behind it. I don’t need analogies either; I understand what behaviours are “supposed” to be from the documentation and comments (perhaps this wasn’t made clear by my post). Where I fall short is “why” are behaviours limited to such and why aren’t more people asking the same questions I am stuck on (regarding polymorphism)? My logic was: yes, this has been asked and discussed some in the past with no real resolution that I could find... therefore, users must be content/accepting of the tools provided. I am not so naive to think I am the first to need/want such, so there must be a disconnect. I posted my example to motivate my questioning hoping for some insight and/or comfort. As of now, I have proceeded with storing “meta refs” to my child servers that are module/reference tuples (along with some dangerous and future-maintenance-issue-causing assumptions regarding their “interface”)... and it’s works... it just smells, and I am always eager to learn and find the right/better/best way. Aside: a colleague came across this repo (https://github.com/eldarko/epolymorph) while digging and the readme seems to capture my use case almost exactly... Brett -- Sent from Gmail Mobile by Brujo Benavides