Re: Local Process Registered Name as Term
Frank Muller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFA6GnAJL2wp1tE226yFLtibQ0Uc6nEzqsjSqx_gJhDYfs1fzA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Vance Checkout gproc or syn. /F. What advice can I get on a process registry solution for local (only) > lookup using term() rather than atom()? > > The obvious candidates are erlang:register/2 for atoms and > global:register_name/2 for other terms: > > erlang:register(Name :: atom()), PidOrPort) -> > global:register_name(Name :: term(), Pid) -> > > Which is fine however when it will only be used locally global is a > heavyweight solution. > > Should I roll my own using ets? A process? Other? > > -- > -Vance >