Re: UBF question

Yes, of course - sorry. :)
[image: Vereign Seal]
<https://gmail.app.vereign.com/#CiADzF7DyQnFXCF2h-_grDadfsNvk4dzylYGEbBPA3_YdBIg6oeD08IIQP3Rl1nTOkfkLbkZUiek6MfTOr0DbzKGPb4=>

On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 5:09 PM Joe Norton <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> For the record, there is also UBF(c).
>
> https://ubf.github.io/ubf/
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2021, at 1:01, Ulf Wiger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> UBF consists of two parts: UBF(a), which describes the daya types, and
> UBF(b), which describes the interaction part.
>
> https://ubf.github.io/ubf/ubf-user-guide.en.html#specifications
>
> BR,
> Ulf W
>
> Den lör 6 nov. 2021 16:14 <[email protected]> skrev:
>
>> Does the role of contract checker act something like validator? If so,
>> does that imply binary_to_term/ term_to_binary does not use that because
>> the communication happens within Erlang environment? I could totally go
>> wrong as I am not familiar with it; but I am curious, because I learned a
>> lot of concepts from Erlang and from reading Joe Armstrong's thesis, even
>> though I never wrote any Erlang code at all. Really appreciate those
>> writings. That helps me a lot in learning system design, and many other
>> parts in programming as well.
>>
>> Oct 28, 2021, 21:51 by [email protected]:
>>
>>
>> The key feature of UBF was that beyond being a serialization format, it
>> was also a contract checker.
>> That was a very nice feature. If you'd like to do something like that
>> today, perhaps you'd go for JSON or MessagePack encoding, JSON-Schema and
>> Jesse.
>>
>> Needless to say, Joe's solution was far more elegant. It was also far
>> less supported, even when he was alive. Joe was always searching for the
>> next interesting challenge, and as memory serves, he parked UBF thinking
>> that he wasn't 100% satisfied with it. It didn't bother him to park
>> something for a decade while trying to address that final wrinkle.
>>
>> BR,
>> Ulf W
>>
>> [image: Vereign Seal]
>> <https://gmail.app.vereign.com/#CiAzy_GB8f6QvveZ4EbTaXoDdsWTb_ETB6W49Cwj1RyD1xIggbHUSgcbmAeIDsfNGcBv5GttvylTY3bzBmlLx8UQ6AA=>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:45 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I haven't used Erlang, so I suppose my question is very naive. I read
>> that UBF[1] is not maintained. So I am wondering what's used by Erlang as
>> serialization format? Is there a new one that replaces UBF? Or UBF is still
>> used as it, it's just not much change as it's stable?
>>
>> If there are UBF alternative options, what options are available?
>>
>> Many thanks
>>
>> [1]. https://github.com/ubf/ubf
>>
>>
>>
> <seal-image-2b121f83eea49a7b1f47514a026bd644601f52a0f203394da1d6a9ca74505d2f.png>
> <seal-image-2b121f83eea49a7b1f47514a026bd644601f52a0f203394da1d6a9ca74505d2f.png>
>
>
>