Re: raw option is missing for file:rename()
Shunichi Shinohara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALxvy4JJKmxMy6cX5gq8PvDhHp656C5F5sqMzKMJqt3nqmn6CA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for your reply. I have decided to use prim_file for the time being, too. Hope it will be included in OTP, or I will try sooner or later. Shino 2021年11月28日(日) 2:55 Mikael Pettersson <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:17 AM Shunichi Shinohara <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi List, > > > > Currently, file:rename() function does not have a variant with options, then > > raw option can not be specified. > > cf. https://www.erlang.org/doc/man/file.html#rename-2 > > Is it reasonable to add file:rename/3 with options in the third argument > > and make it accept option raw? > > > > # Similar thing happened for file:delete at OTP 24: > > # https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/2634 > > A file:rename/3 that accepts a raw option makes perfect sense. We use > prim_file quite a bit, and this would help us stay on official APIs. > > /Mikael