Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)

"Michael P." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Message-ID <20211213182312.66964cd4@aesop>
:-)

On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 16:57:11 +0100
Loïc Hoguin <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Erlang forums have this monstrosity: https://erlangforums.com/tos

Trying to understand the "monstrosity" I found it practical to keep in mind:

The basic right of freedom after speech does not give one
the right to speak one's mind in anyone's living room;
even after an invitation one can be shown the door at any time,
for any reason or none.

And that it is not practical to go into detail, because:

People who do not want to live together cannot --
by no amount of rules or force --
be made to live together.

So ...

> are not owned by the Erlang/OTP team but instead by a third party (and
> possibly set up by their initiative, not the Erlang/OTP team's).

... to be fair:
http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2021-October/101583.html


> If the Erlang/OTP team wants to make the forums a more
> official/permanent venue to reach them then they should also ensure that
> the conditions to use the forums are the same as their other venues.

Is the "monstrosity" not merely a paraphrasing of the conditions
for staying in this old living room here?

Without a Sugarmountain of money or a space-dildo for Captain Kirk,
one cannot afford to get to know the legal situation, or differences,
or consequences, or do anything about them.
And: Two lawyers -- three opinions.

So I will simply continue trying to do the Austin Powers ("Behave!").

:-)

~Michael

--

Normality is merely a question of quantity, not one of quality.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.