Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
"Michael P." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20211213182312.66964cd4@aesop> |
:-) On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 16:57:11 +0100 Loïc Hoguin <[email protected]> wrote: > The Erlang forums have this monstrosity: https://erlangforums.com/tos Trying to understand the "monstrosity" I found it practical to keep in mind: The basic right of freedom after speech does not give one the right to speak one's mind in anyone's living room; even after an invitation one can be shown the door at any time, for any reason or none. And that it is not practical to go into detail, because: People who do not want to live together cannot -- by no amount of rules or force -- be made to live together. So ... > are not owned by the Erlang/OTP team but instead by a third party (and > possibly set up by their initiative, not the Erlang/OTP team's). ... to be fair: http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2021-October/101583.html > If the Erlang/OTP team wants to make the forums a more > official/permanent venue to reach them then they should also ensure that > the conditions to use the forums are the same as their other venues. Is the "monstrosity" not merely a paraphrasing of the conditions for staying in this old living room here? Without a Sugarmountain of money or a space-dildo for Captain Kirk, one cannot afford to get to know the legal situation, or differences, or consequences, or do anything about them. And: Two lawyers -- three opinions. So I will simply continue trying to do the Austin Powers ("Behave!"). :-) ~Michael -- Normality is merely a question of quantity, not one of quality.