Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
Yao Bao <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:44:16 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >> I think keeping the mailing list for the rest of the community would be >> worthwhile. > > Absolutely, then I can choose my own interface, read offline more > easily, etc. - forums-by-mail does tend to be very much a second-class > experience. > Having the ability to go offline completely is a great feature. It means things are still under control. Erlang has this feature, I mean, if someone really wants to understand how Erlang works, a complete copy can be obtained, a great offline documentation can be built, and finally we can dig the source code to find answers. And a copy of a printed book is another great offline example as well. I'm really serious about the foundations/dependencies (which version as well) my work depends upon even though it seems ok if I just ignore it. This is all about control. Take a web product which provide services to end users. It is hard, but if the product creators really care about their product (and their user), what is being used for creating the product needs to be understandable or at least enumerable. For example: - the hardware platform -> amd64 - the operating system -> FreeBSD 13 - server side software -> Erlang 23, C89 (ANSI C) - client side software -> JavaScript (ES6) If I got a problem and really want to address it, I know exactly where to go. Online (always latest) is a great feature which internet gave us, which is great, but the history contains valuable information (mainly what mistakes we did) as well. Cheers, Yao