Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
Sam Overdorf <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:01:53 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE5PUXJgJtjAAAv+=HnS08+=ytvEtCnBwWjopyKdwHAuk8c4MQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I vote to keep the E-mail functional. I like it. Thanks, Sam On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 9:12 AM Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: > > +111111 > > \Frans > > > Op 17 dec. 2021 om 18:02 heeft Igor Clark <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > > > I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you for putting it so carefully and insightfully, Yao. > > > > It would be a great shame to kill the mailing list. It’s different from a forum, and something valuable would be lost. > > > > Best > > Igor > > > >> On 17 Dec 2021, at 15:10, Yao Bao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Erlang bring us together as a community, we don't share data > >> between processes, but we do share love from Erlang. > >> > >> It is not common for programmers say "love" to a programming > >> language. Erlang programmers might not use Erlang in daily job, > >> but we are willing to put some of our life and energy into this. > >> Personally, mainly because of the uncommon beauty of it. > >> > >> Yes, we are still marginal. And this might be the root cause of > >> this movement. I can understand it, but why can't we have both? > >> > >> Yes, resources are always limited, and we can't split energy into > >> two things equally, this is understandable. But having both, or, > >> in a foreseeable future, we might discover some better methods > >> to organize our community, then we can say this is the true "rich" > >> community. New generations are good and unavoidable, but I > >> hope we can keep the old generations as much as we can. > >> > >> Every once in a while, some shiny things appears, and we are > >> not against shiny things, they are good, if it is good enough to > >> replace the old one entirely, nobody will miss it. We just need > >> sometime to prove it. > >> > >> We can deprecate language features, but I hope we do not > >> deprecate people. Shiny tools can attract young generations, > >> I don't know the story or history about Elixir forums, but I would > >> say the biggest difference would be the origin of these two > >> languages. Of course it is good to have a try, after receiving the > >> new Erlang forums announcement, I give it a try almost > >> immediately, and personally prefer this mailing list for now. > >> > >> Although as we see, this mailing list is not very "active", but we > >> really care about it. And this might be why some "sad" emotion > >> comes along. If we don't care about it, we would not say any word > >> about it. > >> > >> I really hope this mailing list is still alive. Maybe one reason would > >> be good enough to keep it: old generations are still alive. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Yao > >>