Re: Erlang forums (was Re: PING TEST)
"Tristan Sloughter" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Dec 2021 18:28:46 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Just wanted to say I'm glad the mailing list will be discontinued so that there is not a split in where new information can be found or where questions should be asked -- which is my issue with not merging ElixirForum into a BEAM Forum :). For those who are so unsatisfied with the mailing list feature of discourse or discourse itself they don't want to participate they can create and moderate a mailing list themselves. I'd hate if it created a split like the one between the Erlang and Elixir forum, but I'm not too worried. On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, at 16:01, Sam Overdorf wrote: > I vote to keep the E-mail functional. > I like it. > Thanks, > Sam > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 9:12 AM Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +111111 >> >> \Frans >> >> > Op 17 dec. 2021 om 18:02 heeft Igor Clark <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >> > >> > I agree wholeheartedly. Thank you for putting it so carefully and insightfully, Yao. >> > >> > It would be a great shame to kill the mailing list. It’s different from a forum, and something valuable would be lost. >> > >> > Best >> > Igor >> > >> >> On 17 Dec 2021, at 15:10, Yao Bao <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> Erlang bring us together as a community, we don't share data >> >> between processes, but we do share love from Erlang. >> >> >> >> It is not common for programmers say "love" to a programming >> >> language. Erlang programmers might not use Erlang in daily job, >> >> but we are willing to put some of our life and energy into this. >> >> Personally, mainly because of the uncommon beauty of it. >> >> >> >> Yes, we are still marginal. And this might be the root cause of >> >> this movement. I can understand it, but why can't we have both? >> >> >> >> Yes, resources are always limited, and we can't split energy into >> >> two things equally, this is understandable. But having both, or, >> >> in a foreseeable future, we might discover some better methods >> >> to organize our community, then we can say this is the true "rich" >> >> community. New generations are good and unavoidable, but I >> >> hope we can keep the old generations as much as we can. >> >> >> >> Every once in a while, some shiny things appears, and we are >> >> not against shiny things, they are good, if it is good enough to >> >> replace the old one entirely, nobody will miss it. We just need >> >> sometime to prove it. >> >> >> >> We can deprecate language features, but I hope we do not >> >> deprecate people. Shiny tools can attract young generations, >> >> I don't know the story or history about Elixir forums, but I would >> >> say the biggest difference would be the origin of these two >> >> languages. Of course it is good to have a try, after receiving the >> >> new Erlang forums announcement, I give it a try almost >> >> immediately, and personally prefer this mailing list for now. >> >> >> >> Although as we see, this mailing list is not very "active", but we >> >> really care about it. And this might be why some "sad" emotion >> >> comes along. If we don't care about it, we would not say any word >> >> about it. >> >> >> >> I really hope this mailing list is still alive. Maybe one reason would >> >> be good enough to keep it: old generations are still alive. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Yao >> >>